NIH Information Quality
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is committed to applying rigorous scientific standards to ensure the accuracy and reliability of research results. For scientific and technical documents, the scientific community recognizes peer review as the primary means of quality control. NIH routinely seeks the input of highly qualified peer reviewers on the propriety, accuracy, completeness, and quality (including objectivity, utility, and integrity) of its materials.
Although the specific application of peer review throughout the scientific process may vary, the overall goal is to obtain an objective evaluation of scientific information from fellow scientists. To encourage the use of peer review of official Government scientific information disseminated by a Federal agency, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued guidelines creating standards for peer review. The OMB Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review are part of a broader effort under the 2001 Information Quality Act (Public Law No. 106-554, Section 515[a]), PDF version, to ensure the quality of all information disseminated by Federal agencies.
Peer Review Agenda for NIH and NIH Information Quality Guidelines
If NIH denies a request for correction, the requestor may send, within 30 days of receipt of the agency’s decision, a written request for reconsideration. The request should state the reasons for the appeal and may be sent as hard copy or electronically to Erica.Grant@nih.gov. Requestors should reference the NIH tracking number provided in the NIH response to the original request. If sent by hard copy, requestors should also clearly mark the appeal and the outside envelope with “Information Quality Appeal,” and send the appeal to the following address:
Marina Volkov, Ph.D.
Office of Evaluation, Performance, and Reporting
Office of the Director
National Institutes of Health
6011 Executive Boulevard, Suite 206
Rockville, MD 20852
Frequently Asked Questions
This page last reviewed on December 4, 2018