NIH Information Quality
Revised Draft NTP Monograph on Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects
| Document, Report, or Other Product Information | |
|---|---|
| Title: | Revised Draft NTP Monograph on Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects |
| Subject: | The National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted a systematic review of the effects of fluoride on neurodevelopment and cognition in children and adults. The assessment integrated the evidence from human, experimental animal, and mechanistic studies. This revised monograph addresses deficiencies identified during external peer review in various aspects of some studies, and in the analysis, summary, and presentation of data in the draft monograph. |
| Purpose (e.g., abstract): | The draft monograph underwent external peer review by an ad hoc committee convened by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). The committee concluded that further analysis or reanalysis was needed to support NTP's conclusions regarding fluoride exposure and effects on neurodevelopment and cognition. A revised draft monograph has been prepared for external peer review by a NASEM committee. |
| Information Product Contact | |
| ISI or HISA: | HISA |
| Link to Information Product: | |
| IC: | NIEHS |
| IC Division, Office, or Program: | Division of the National Toxicology Program |
| NIH Contact: | Mary
Wolfe 919-541-7539 [email protected] |
| Reviewer Names and Expertise: | |
| Review Description: | External peer review of the revised draft monograph. Inquiries should be directed to NASEM. |
| Date of Review: | |
| Number of Reviewers: | |
| Reviewer Nominations Requested? | |
| Upcoming Panels, Events: | View Upcoming Panels, Events, Notices, Meeting Updates |
| Technical/Draft Reports, Public Comments and Presentations: | |
| Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates: | View Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates |
| Reviewer Expertise: | |
| How Selected: | NASEM will identify and select |
| Opportunity for Public Comment? | YES |
| Did any reviewers require any exception to the applicable independence or COI standards of the Bulletin, including determination by the Sec./Dep. Sec. pursuant to Section (3)(c)? | |
| Were any waivers, deferrals, exemptions, or alterative peer review processes used? | |
| Any Public Meetings? | |
| Number of Public Comments Received | |
This page last reviewed on