NIH Information Quality
Report of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Preterm Infants Working Group of the National Advisory Council of Child Health and Human Development (NACHHD)
| Document, Report, or Other Product Information | |
|---|---|
| Title: | Report of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Preterm Infants Working Group of the National Advisory Council of Child Health and Human Development (NACHHD) |
| Subject: | The state of the science in enteral feeding practices in premature infants and the risk for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). |
| Purpose (e.g., abstract): | The NEC WG was charged with the following: (1) Assess the scientific evidence regarding enteral feeding practices in premature infants and factors that may protect against or increase risk for NEC. (2) Identify important research gaps. (3) Make recommendations for potential future research directions. |
| Information Product Contact | |
| ISI or HISA: | ISI |
| Link to Information Product: | |
| IC: | NICHD |
| IC Division, Office, or Program: | |
| NIH Contact: | Sarah
Glavin 301-496-7898 [email protected] |
| Reviewer Names and Expertise: | |
| Review Description: | see appendix A of report. 26 scientific experts participated in the review. The experts attended public meetings, reviewed and commented on the resulting report, based on their extensive knowledge of the subject matter. Comments were submitted to and adjudicated by the panel co-chairs. |
| Date of Review: | 2024-09-16 |
| Number of Reviewers: | 26 |
| Reviewer Nominations Requested? | |
| Upcoming Panels, Events: | View Upcoming Panels, Events, Notices, Meeting Updates |
| Technical/Draft Reports, Public Comments and Presentations: | https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/2024.09.16_NEC_WG_report_FINAL.pdf |
| Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates: | View Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates |
| Reviewer Expertise: | Expertise included neonatology, gasterointerology, epidemiology, health services research, lactation research, and other areas essential to the work. |
| How Selected: | Reviewers were selected on the basis of scientific expertise. Potential COI was assessed at the outset and individuals with COI were not selected. |
| Opportunity for Public Comment? | NO |
| Did any reviewers require any exception to the applicable independence or COI standards of the Bulletin, including determination by the Sec./Dep. Sec. pursuant to Section (3)(c)? | |
| Were any waivers, deferrals, exemptions, or alterative peer review processes used? | |
| Any Public Meetings? | YES |
| Number of Public Comments Received | |
This page last reviewed on