NIH Information Quality
Draft Report on Carcinogens Monograph on Shiftwork, Light at Night, and Circadian Disruption
Document, Report, or Other Product Information | |
---|---|
Title: | Draft Report on Carcinogens Monograph on Shiftwork, Light at Night, and Circadian Disruption |
Subject: | Peer review of the Draft Report on Carcinogens Monograph on Shiftwork, Light at Night, and Circadian Disruption |
Purpose (e.g., abstract): | NTP is evaluating shiftwork, light at night, and circadian disruption for possible listing in the Report on Carcinogens. The draft RoC monograph consists of an assessment of human, experimental animal, and mechanistic data. It presents NTP’s preliminary conclusions regarding level of evidence and the preliminary listing recommendation for listing in the Report on Carcinogens. The purpose is to have external peer review of the draft monograph. Once the peer review is set, information will be posted at https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/rocprp |
Information Product Contact | |
ISI or HISA: | HISA |
Link to Information Product: | |
IC: | NIEHS |
IC Division, Office, or Program: | Division of the National Toxicology Program |
NIH Contact: | Mary
Wolfe 984-287-3209 [email protected] |
Reviewer Names and Expertise: | |
Review Description: | to obtain external, scientific peer review of the draft RoC monograph Date of Review: |
Date of Review: | |
Number of Reviewers: | 6-8 |
Reviewer Nominations Requested? | |
Upcoming Panels, Events: | View Upcoming Panels, Events, Notices, Meeting Updates |
Technical/Draft Reports, Public Comments and Presentations: | https://infoquality.osp.od.nih.gov/once%20date%20is%20set,%20see%20https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/38854 |
Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates: | View Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates |
Reviewer Expertise: | exposure assessment, toxicology, genetic toxicology, carcinogenicity, pathology, epidemiology, metabolism |
How Selected: | NTP |
Opportunity for Public Comment? | YES |
Did any reviewers require any exception to the applicable independence or COI standards of the Bulletin, including determination by the Sec./Dep. Sec. pursuant to Section (3)(c)? | |
Were any waivers, deferrals, exemptions, or alterative peer review processes used? | |
Any Public Meetings? | |
Number of Public Comments Received |
This page last reviewed on