| Document, Report, or Other Product Information | |
|---|---|
| Title: | Draft NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects |
| Subject: | The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has conducted a systematic review of the effects of fluoride on neurodevelopment and cognition in children and adults. The assessment is an integration of human, animal, and mechanistic data. |
| Purpose (e.g., abstract): | The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has conducted a systematic review of the effects of fluoride on neurodevelopment and cognition in children and adults. The assessment is an integration of human, animal, and mechanistic data. Purpose (e.g., abstract): NTP has engaged the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct external peer review of the draft monograph. |
| Information Product Contact | |
| ISI or HISA: | HISA |
| Is it a public panel or letter review? | |
| Link to Information Product: | |
| IC: | NIEHS |
| IC Division, Office, or Program: | Division of the National Toxicology Program |
| NIH Contact: | Mary
Wolfe 919-541-7539 [email protected] |
| Reviewer Names and Expertise: | |
| Review Description: | External peer review of the draft monograph; Inquiries should be directed to Sarah Harper ([email protected], (202) 334-3353) |
| Date of Review: | 11/06/2019 |
| Number of Reviewers: | 11 |
| Reviewer Nominations Requested? | |
| Upcoming Panels, Events: | |
| Technical/Draft Reports, Public Comments and Presentations: | https://www8.nationalacademies.org/pa/projectview.aspx?key=51752 |
| Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates: | |
| Reviewer Expertise: | panelists biosketches at https://www8.nationalacademies.org/pa/projectview.aspx?key=51752 |
| How Selected: | NASEM identified and selected |
| Opportunity for Public Comment? | YES |
| Did any reviewers require any exception to the applicable independence or COI standards of the Bulletin, including determination by the Sec./Dep. Sec. pursuant to Section (3)(c)? | |
| Were any waivers, deferrals, exemptions, or alterative peer review processes used? | |
| Any Public Meetings? | |
| Number of Public Comments Received | |