NIH Information Quality

Draft NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects

Document, Report, or Other Product Information
Title: Draft NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects
Subject: The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has conducted a systematic review of the effects of fluoride on neurodevelopment and cognition in children and adults. The assessment is an integration of human, animal, and mechanistic data.
Purpose (e.g., abstract): The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has conducted a systematic review of the effects of fluoride on neurodevelopment and cognition in children and adults. The assessment is an integration of human, animal, and mechanistic data. Purpose (e.g., abstract): NTP has engaged the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct external peer review of the draft monograph.
Information Product Contact
ISI or HISA: HISA
Is it a public panel or letter review?
Link to Information Product:
IC: NIEHS
IC Division, Office, or Program: Division of the National Toxicology Program
NIH Contact: Mary Wolfe
919-541-7539
[email protected]
Reviewer Names and Expertise:
Review Description: External peer review of the draft monograph; Inquiries should be directed to Sarah Harper ([email protected], (202) 334-3353)
Date of Review: 11/06/2019
Number of Reviewers: 11
Reviewer Nominations Requested?
Upcoming Panels, Events:
Technical/Draft Reports, Public Comments and Presentations: https://www8.nationalacademies.org/pa/projectview.aspx?key=51752
Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates:
Reviewer Expertise: panelists biosketches at https://www8.nationalacademies.org/pa/projectview.aspx?key=51752
How Selected: NASEM identified and selected
Opportunity for Public Comment? YES
Did any reviewers require any exception to the applicable independence or COI standards of the Bulletin, including determination by the Sec./Dep. Sec. pursuant to Section (3)(c)?
Were any waivers, deferrals, exemptions, or alterative peer review processes used?
Any Public Meetings?
Number of Public Comments Received
This page last reviewed on