NIH Information Quality
Draft NTP Monograph on the State of the Science on Fluoride and Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Health Effects
| Document, Report, or Other Product Information | |
|---|---|
| Title: | Draft NTP Monograph on the State of the Science on Fluoride and Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Health Effects |
| Subject: | The overall objective of this evaluation was to conduct a systematic review of published literature concerning the potential for exposure to fluoride to affect neurodevelopment and cognition. The review only addresses whether exposure to fluoride from any source could present a potential hazard (i.e., has the potential to cause harm, at any exposure level, including exposures that are higher than those typically encountered in the United States). Benefits of fluoride with respect to oral health are acknowledged but not addressed in this monograph. |
| Purpose (e.g., abstract): | This letter review to be initiated in fall 2021 is to conduct external peer review of the draft NTP Monograph on the State of the Science on Fluoride and Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Health Effects. |
| Information Product Contact | |
| ISI or HISA: | ISI |
| Link to Information Product: | |
| IC: | NIEHS |
| IC Division, Office, or Program: | Division of the National Toxicology Program |
| NIH Contact: | Mary
Wolfe 919-541-7539 [email protected] |
| Reviewer Names and Expertise: | |
| Review Description: | External scientific experts will review the draft report via letter |
| Date of Review: | 2021-11-16 |
| Number of Reviewers: | 5 |
| Reviewer Nominations Requested? | |
| Upcoming Panels, Events: | View Upcoming Panels, Events, Notices, Meeting Updates |
| Technical/Draft Reports, Public Comments and Presentations: | |
| Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates: | View Past Roster, Notices, Meeting Updates |
| Reviewer Expertise: | systematic review, fluoride, neurodevelopment/cognition, cohorts |
| How Selected: | NTP selected from identified experts |
| Opportunity for Public Comment? | NO |
| Did any reviewers require any exception to the applicable independence or COI standards of the Bulletin, including determination by the Sec./Dep. Sec. pursuant to Section (3)(c)? | |
| Were any waivers, deferrals, exemptions, or alterative peer review processes used? | |
| Any Public Meetings? | |
| Number of Public Comments Received | |
This page last reviewed on